Profile

Name:Marshall Breeding
Title:Publisher
Organization:Library Technology Guides

Photo of Marshall Breeding author of

Archive

Apr 2014 (1 post)
Mar 2014 (1 post)
Feb 2014 (1 post)
Dec 2013 (1 post)
Nov 2013 (3 posts)
Aug 2013 (2 posts)
Jun 2013 (1 post)
Apr 2013 (1 post)
Jan 2013 (2 posts)
Dec 2012 (1 post)
Nov 2012 (1 post)
Oct 2012 (1 post)
Sep 2012 (1 post)
Aug 2012 (1 post)
Jun 2012 (2 posts)
May 2012 (3 posts)
Mar 2012 (1 post)
Feb 2012 (1 post)
Jan 2012 (2 posts)
Dec 2011 (3 posts)
Nov 2011 (3 posts)
Oct 2011 (1 post)
Aug 2011 (1 post)
Jul 2011 (1 post)
May 2011 (1 post)
Apr 2011 (1 post)
Mar 2011 (3 posts)
Jan 2011 (1 post)
Dec 2010 (2 posts)
Nov 2010 (2 posts)
Sep 2010 (1 post)
Aug 2010 (2 posts)
Jul 2010 (1 post)
Jun 2010 (2 posts)
May 2010 (1 post)
Mar 2010 (2 posts)
Feb 2010 (1 post)
Jan 2010 (3 posts)
Dec 2009 (2 posts)
Nov 2009 (2 posts)
Oct 2009 (3 posts)
Sep 2009 (2 posts)
Aug 2009 (1 post)
Jul 2009 (1 post)
Jun 2009 (1 post)
May 2009 (1 post)
Apr 2009 (2 posts)
Mar 2009 (1 post)
Feb 2009 (1 post)
Jan 2009 (2 posts)
Dec 2008 (1 post)
Oct 2008 (2 posts)
Sep 2008 (2 posts)
Aug 2008 (5 posts)
Jul 2008 (1 post)
Jun 2008 (4 posts)
May 2008 (2 posts)
Apr 2008 (3 posts)
Mar 2008 (2 posts)
Feb 2008 (2 posts)
Jan 2008 (2 posts)
Dec 2007 (2 posts)
Nov 2007 (3 posts)
Oct 2007 (3 posts)
Sep 2007 (1 post)
Aug 2007 (3 posts)
Jul 2007 (1 post)

GuidePosts

Perspective and commentary by Marshall Breeding

Blog Archive subscribe to GuidePosts via RSS

The ILS score among the ARLs

GuidePost image
One of the benchmarks that I find helpful to gauge the ILS arena among large academic libraries involves a long-standing chart that I have maintained that tracks the automation systems used among the members of the 123 Association of Research Libraries. These libraries generally represent the largest and best funded in the U.S. and Canada.

Whoís in the lead? Depends on how you count. Innovativeís Millennium stands as the ILS with the most ARL adopters (38). Ex Libris, however, now ranks as the company with the most ARL customers, since they can count both the 35 Voyager sites and the 22 ALEPH 500 sites. If you also include the libraries using other Ex Libris products such as SFX, MetaLib, Verde, and DigiTool, Ex Libris claims over 100 of the ARLís as their customers.

While the ARLs gravitate to a select group of systems, some follow a less traveled path. The University of California at Berkeley continues to operate the system that they developed locally; the National and Archives of Canada stands as the sole ARL using Amicus, The University of Montreal has announced no plans to migrate from Advance.

The score hasnít changed in a while. Now that New York University has decided to go with ALPEH 500 following their aborted implementation of Virtua, Ex Libris gains a point. The SirsiDynix announcement to discontinue forward development of Horizon inevitably means some redistribution, over the next 2-3 years. Weíll be watching those libraries to see if they stay with their incumbent company and shift to Unicorn (aka Symphony) or if they gravitate toward other competitors.

So far, none of the ARLís have selected an open source ILS. Any movement in that direction among this group of libraries will represent a remarkable shift in the library automation arena.

But, then, who's keeping score? I guess I am.

Marshall Breeding Nov 2, 2007 09:56:54 Link to this thread Digg it!  Share on Facebook  post to del.icio.us

Login or register to leave a comment.


Engaging in online social networks

Over the last year, the library world has gravitated to Facebook and other social networking sites in a big way. In my column for the September 2007 issue of Computers in Libraries titled ďLibrarians face online social networks,Ē I gave an overview of online social network sites, featuring Facebook as an example.

Computers in Libraries September 2007 Edition

I find Facebook to be a great way to keep up with my colleagues around the world that I have gotten to know in my travels. I think that itís important for those of us that work in libraries to gain some experience with these kinds of social networking sites that attract the interest of so many of our users.

Facebook is just one example. LinkedIn has grown to be one of the main sites for making professional connections. Iíve just started to build my LinkedIn network. While I see all these sites as having great potential, itís quite a challenge for me to make time to keep up with them.

You can view a list of my other Systems Librarian columns published in Computers in Libraries.

Marshall Breeding Nov 22, 2007 12:10:03 Link to this thread Digg it!  Share on Facebook  post to del.icio.us


Well Linkedin is pretty different than all the other networking sites. Linkedin is very professional than any other social networking site. It can be termed as business networking site. More than fun people join Linkedin for purpose. I came across this site from some of the Blog which say Linkedin can be accessed over the phone without internet. In fact with this service, Linkedin access will be even more convenient than ever.

http://modazzle.com/cms/modazzleLp1.html?channel=CM&camp=LinkedIn

Derek Brown Dec 17, 2007 02:52:06

Login or register to leave a comment.


Automation systems in US Public Libraries

One of the main components of Library Technology Guides is the lib-web-cats directory of libraries. One of the key features of this directory involves the data describing the automation system used by each of the libraries. With this information, I am able to measure the relative proportions of each automation system installed in libraries, and track trends of migration.

Automation Trends in US Public Libraries

Lib-web-cats lists 9,277 public library systems in the United States representing a total of 16,959 facilities. By using data from the National Center for Educational Statistics, at least a skeletal record exists for every library. While the NCES data gives me a comprehensive list as a starting point, it does not include the information that interests me such as the URLs of the libraryís Web site, online catalog, and the current and previous automation systems employed. Iíve enhanced each listing with that information as Iím able to find it. For most libraries, Iím able to collect this information by visiting the Web site. Small rural libraries present the greatest challenge since many of them lack a Web site. While Iím confident about the data for mid-sized and larger public library systems, Iím continually scouring the Web for information on the smaller ones.

I have created a few pages that present some of the trends, including a basic page for browsing through all US Public Libraries, one that shows ILS implementations, that links to reports to each state, such as this one for Tennessee.

Gathering information on the library automation systems used by public libraries in the US has proven to be a never-ending project. I encourage anyone to send me information that might be missing from lib-web-cats. Any one registered on Library Technology Guides can add or modify entries. To ensure consistency and any possible malicious changes, I monitor and review all changes.

One of the basic tenents of Library Technology Guides and my personal approach to the industry involves putting as much information in public view as possible. I see great benefit in creating a comprehensive resource describing the technology deployed throughout the country. Such a resource describes the current state of technology, provides historical trends, and helps inform decisions as libraries move forward.

Marshall Breeding Nov 22, 2007 13:01:27 Link to this thread Digg it!  Share on Facebook  post to del.icio.us

Login or register to leave a comment.