One of the key components of Library Technology Guides is the libraries.org (formerly lib-web-cats) directory of libraries that provides details about libraries and the major technology products they use. This resource can be used to identify and assess the adoption patterns of systems used among any given group of libraries. The advanced search provides the ability to select libraries according to geographic categories, collection size, library type, and other factors. I had previously created specialized reports for groups of particular interest such as the members of the Association of Research Libraries, the Urban Libraries Council, and the Association of Southeastern Research Libraries.
An additional tool is now available that produces reports of academic libraries in the United States and their automation systems according to the Carnegie Classification Levels of their parent institutions. This capability was made possible through the extension of the data elements for of the entries for academic libraries in the United States.
View it now: ILS report by Carnegie Classification.
By default, the initial report shown corresponds to the Doctoral/Research Universities-Extensive (classification level 15). A drop-down list allows you to select any of the other classification reports.
The reports derived from some of the classification groups will include libraries where the ILS used is missing. Most of these represent libraries that were newly added to the libraries.org database. Any help in identifying the automation systems used in this libraries will be appreciated.
The data for the academic libraries was enhanced by loading selected data elements from the 2012 data set available from the National Center for Educational Statistics. This process involved creating a delimited file with the data, matching existing records based on the NCES institutional identifier that was already present on most of the entries for academic libraries in the United States.
Record elements loaded included:
|UNITID||Unique NCES identifier used as the match point|
|ADDR||Address, used if a new record needs to be created|
|CITY||City, used if a new record needs to be created|
|STABBR||State, used if a new record needs to be created|
|ZIP||Postal Code. used if a new record needs to be created|
|WEBADDR||URL for institution web site|
|SECTOR||describes whether the institution is public or private, for-profit or non-profit.|
|CARNEGIE||2000 Carnegie Classification|
|BRANCHES||Number of branch and independent libraries (exclude main or central library)|
|EXCOMP||Expenditures for computer hardware and software|
|EXCUSER||Expenditures for current serial subscriptions|
|EXELSER||Expenditures for electronic serials|
|EXBKS||Expenditures for books, serial backfiles and other materials|
|EXELBKS||Expenditures for electronic Books, electronic serial backfiles and other electronic materials|
|COLBKSH||Books, serial backfiles and other paper materials|
|CRGEN||General circulation transactions|
|ICLEVEL||Level of Institution|
|FTEUSED||Fall Collection full-time equivalent student enrollment|
These additional data elements display on each entry and some have been enabled as search terms. The selection according to Carnegie Classification is the most interesting example. In the future I will enable selection by for-profit / non-profit and private vs. public institutions, once data for other records beyond the academic libraries in the United States is more fully populated.
New records were created if they didn't already exist in the libraries.org database. Data were merged if a unique match was identified.
The NCES data on expenditures reported for each library provides some insight into technology budgets for each library or across categories of libraries. The reports calculate the aggregate and average total expenditures and those directed to technology. This data enables the calculation of the average percentage allocated to technology for each classification level.
The NCES data set of 4,262 libraries included 1,622 that were not previously represented in libraries.org. A few of these were smaller academic libraries that I had not previously come across, but the majority were those associated with for-profit educational institutions that I had intentionally not included since few of these offer traditional libraries. The addition of these libraries will enable some interesting comparisons.
The match and overlay of a data set such as this naturally requires a bit of clean up. Some duplicate records were created. I have identified and merged those that I initially identified and will fix others as I make a more systematic sweep of this section of the database.
The ILS Reports by Carnegie Classifications is based on the basic classifications published in 2000 that were included in the NCES data set. Work is underway to load the basic classifications published in 2010 that the Carnegie Foundation makes available.
Marshall Breeding Aug 13, 2014 10:25:57 Link to this thread