Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Statistical Report for Evergreen -- Equinox Software

2013 Survey Results 2012 Survey Results 2011 Survey Results 2010 Survey Results 2009 Survey Results 2008 Survey Results 2007 Survey Results
Product: Evergreen -- Equinox Software Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction54 1 3 3 2 7 14 13 11 76.897
ILS Functionality54 2 2 2 1 3 9 10 15 10 86.767
Print Functionality54 1 1 3 2 5 11 19 12 87.268
Electronic Functionality54 4 1 2 5 3 10 3 15 6 5 75.526
Company Satisfaction53 1 2 1 2 2 4 11 17 13 87.118
Support Satisfaction52 1 1 1 3 5 4 11 12 14 97.028
Support Improvement53 1 1 2 8 6 13 12 10 76.857
Company Loyalty52 2 2 1 3 4 1 10 12 17 97.008
Open Source Interest47 6 1 3 2 1 2 5 27 96.949

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS54 11.85%
Considering new Interface54 23.70%
System Installed on time?54 4583.33%
Average Collection size: 186961
TypeCount
Public43
Academic5
School0
Consortia0
Special1
Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0003
[2] 10,001-100,00032
[3] 100,001-250,00011
[4] 250,001-1,000,0005
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0002
[6] over 10,000,0010
Product: Evergreen -- Equinox Software Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction85 9 4 3 9 8 23 20 9 76.217
ILS Functionality85 1 3 15 7 11 24 16 8 76.297
Print Functionality0 06.29
Electronic Functionality0 06.29
Company Satisfaction85 1 2 12 8 6 19 18 19 76.817
Support Satisfaction84 1 1 1 3 12 5 8 16 14 23 96.717
Support Improvement83 2 1 1 10 19 10 10 16 14 56.296
Company Loyalty82 5 1 1 10 5 4 16 19 21 96.657
Open Source Interest72 8 2 1 1 2 1 3 6 48 97.299

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS89 00.00%
Considering new Interface89 33.37%
System Installed on time?89 7685.39%
Average Collection size: 1089334
TypeCount
Public80
Academic2
School1
Consortia0
Special1
Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0004
[2] 10,001-100,00060
[3] 100,001-250,00011
[4] 250,001-1,000,0008
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0002
[6] over 10,000,0011
Product: Evergreen -- Equinox Software Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction50 1 1 1 4 2 9 18 9 5 76.527
ILS Functionality49 1 1 2 3 3 8 20 8 3 76.297
Print Functionality0 06.29
Electronic Functionality0 06.29
Company Satisfaction50 2 3 2 4 4 5 21 9 86.908
Support Satisfaction50 2 1 3 5 7 5 17 10 86.868
Support Improvement48 2 1 1 16 6 4 12 6 56.276
Company Loyalty48 5 2 1 2 2 3 5 9 19 96.698
Open Source Interest38 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 27 97.539

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS52 11.92%
Considering new Interface52 11.92%
System Installed on time?52 4484.62%
Average Collection size: 120847
TypeCount
Public49
Academic2
School0
Consortia0
Special0
Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0002
[2] 10,001-100,00030
[3] 100,001-250,0006
[4] 250,001-1,000,0008
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010
Product: Evergreen -- Equinox Software Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction0 0120846.54
ILS Functionality0 0120846.54
Print Functionality0 0120846.54
Electronic Functionality0 0120846.54
Company Satisfaction0 0120846.54
Support Satisfaction0 0120846.54
Support Improvement0 0120846.54
Company Loyalty0 0120846.54
Open Source Interest0 0120846.54

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS0 00.00%
Considering new Interface0 00.00%
System Installed on time?0 00.00%
Average Collection size: 120847
TypeCount
Public0
Academic0
School0
Consortia0
Special0
Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0000
[2] 10,001-100,0000
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010
Product: Evergreen -- Equinox Software Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction0 0120846.54
ILS Functionality0 0120846.54
Print Functionality0 0120846.54
Electronic Functionality0 0120846.54
Company Satisfaction0 0120846.54
Support Satisfaction0 0120846.54
Support Improvement0 0120846.54
Company Loyalty0 0120846.54
Open Source Interest0 0120846.54

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS0 00.00%
Considering new Interface0 00.00%
System Installed on time?0 00.00%
Product: Evergreen -- Equinox Software Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction0 0120846.54
ILS Functionality0 0120846.54
Print Functionality0 0120846.54
Electronic Functionality0 0120846.54
Company Satisfaction0 0120846.54
Support Satisfaction0 0120846.54
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty0 0120846.54
Open Source Interest0 0120846.54

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS0 00.00%
Considering new Interface0 00.00%
System Installed on time?0 00.00%
Product: Evergreen -- Equinox Software Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction0 0120846.54
ILS Functionality0 0120846.54
Print Functionality0 0120846.54
Electronic Functionality0 0120846.54
Company Satisfaction0 0120846.54
Support Satisfaction0 0120846.54
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty0 0120846.54
Open Source Interest0 0120846.54

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS0 00.00%
Considering new Interface0 00.00%
System Installed on time?0 00.00%

Comments

Evergreen is an open source product that is limited by [...] lack of willingness to implement change. There is no acquisitions module, a serious lack in an ILS. We had challenges implementing RFID with our version of EG, but they have been resolved for the most part. (Type: Public)

Using an open source ILS for 1.5 yrs. It's been very rocky mainly due to the size of our consortium and lack of adequate quality assurance testing by software support company prior to implementation. Several libraries and many staff members and library patrons in this consortium have been extremely disappointed and concerned this ILS is the correct choice for this group of libraries. [...] is working very hard to improve the OS software, but it has been a very rough first two years. Some libraries still have doubts about whether to consider a different ILS. (Type: Public)

WE went 'live' on SITKA/Evergreen 2008 (Type: Public)

The Evergreen ILS is an open source program. (Type: Public)

We cannot afford to change and could not possibly offer the resource sharing options availabel in [...] with any other option. (Type: Public)

[...] is a multi-type consortium of 72 libraries in over 120 locations in two [...] provinces, using the Evergreen open source ILS in a centrally hosted environment. Sitka has its own dedicated support team for member libraries, with assistance from, as well as providing assistance to, the wider Evergreen open source community. Suggestions regarding this survey: The survey is written for the more traditional vendor/customer dynamic. As an open-source, self-supporting and community-supported ILS in a consortial environment, it is very difficult to answer several of these questions accurately, e.g. "Where does this library direct most of its ILS Support issues" - would be helpful to have a third option such as "Self-supported"; "How likely is it that this library would consider implementing an open source ILS?" - suggest adding at least one question that asks if the ILS currently in use is open source or not. Thank you very much for the opportunity to respond to this survey! (Type: Consortium)

The Library System deals directly with the company on any issues that we may have. As far as I know, the problems are dealt with quickly. I do not remember the exact details of why we did not migrate on time, but I do know that it was delayed. (Type: Public)

Streaming video 9,000; 5000 video, 140,000 ebooks (Type: Academic)

We have an existing discovery layer but we found they did not have enough contacts in the publishing/book world to deliver proper cover art, summaries, reviews and awards for our catalog. We are looking for a more robust content provider that incudes DVD, CD as well as books (Type: Public)

We have discussed concerns about existing ILS but are just in beginning stages (Type: Consortium)

The system has been unstable and we have response time issues. Equinox seems to be responsive, but as members of a state consortium we don't actually have access to the vendor - we have to go through the State Library for everything. Therefore, we don't have first hand knowledge, and have to rely on what we are told. (Type: Public)

The core functions of the Evergreen software work well, and we are generally satisfied. (Type: Consortium)

Several questions are beyond our scope as decisions are made on the system level and I have no input at this time. (Type: Public)

The system would be easier for us to use if we had the man-power to make all the minor tweeks needed to make the system work better. Even then, these minor tweeks would only help to a certain extent. Overall Evergreen just seems to be a poorly constructed system built by non-Librarians that should probably get an entire overhaul. Evergreen is not a good fit for academic/special libraries either, having been originally built for large public consortia. (Type: Music)

Already using open source ILS (Type: Public)

We were able to move from Sirsi Unicorn to the Evergreen system in a month due to the hard work of the Library team and the Equinox company, which was very responsive. (Type: Academic)

ILS