Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Statistical Report for Koha -- ByWater Solutions

2013 Survey Results 2012 Survey Results 2011 Survey Results 2010 Survey Results 2009 Survey Results 2008 Survey Results 2007 Survey Results
Product: Koha -- ByWater Solutions Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction89 1 1 2 3 8 19 27 28 97.618
ILS Functionality89 1 1 2 4 9 29 25 18 77.297
Print Functionality89 1 2 1 2 3 15 32 33 97.848
Electronic Functionality85 3 3 2 1 3 10 12 17 20 14 86.467
Company Satisfaction89 1 1 2 1 3 5 10 25 41 97.838
Support Satisfaction88 1 2 1 1 4 3 10 24 42 97.848
Support Improvement82 1 1 1 13 8 11 19 28 97.308
Company Loyalty88 4 2 2 1 7 1 9 14 48 97.489
Open Source Interest78 2 1 1 1 1 6 2 2 62 98.009

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS91 33.30%
Considering new Interface91 77.69%
System Installed on time?91 8593.41%
Average Collection size: 100698
TypeCount
Public53
Academic21
School3
Consortia0
Special2
Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0005
[2] 10,001-100,00057
[3] 100,001-250,00016
[4] 250,001-1,000,0006
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010
Product: Koha -- ByWater Solutions Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction63 1 1 5 14 25 17 87.788
ILS Functionality63 1 1 2 4 18 27 10 87.488
Print Functionality0 07.48
Electronic Functionality0 07.48
Company Satisfaction63 1 1 1 2 12 11 35 98.119
Support Satisfaction63 1 1 2 14 12 33 98.059
Support Improvement59 1 2 4 5 5 6 13 23 97.278
Company Loyalty61 2 2 2 2 8 8 37 98.029
Open Source Interest57 2 1 2 2 3 2 45 98.219

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS65 00.00%
Considering new Interface65 11.54%
System Installed on time?65 5990.77%
Average Collection size: 148035
TypeCount
Public40
Academic11
School3
Consortia0
Special1
Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0004
[2] 10,001-100,00044
[3] 100,001-250,0009
[4] 250,001-1,000,0005
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010
Product: Koha -- ByWater Solutions Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction59 1 1 3 3 13 23 15 87.618
ILS Functionality59 1 1 3 9 17 17 11 77.257
Print Functionality0 07.25
Electronic Functionality0 07.25
Company Satisfaction59 2 1 1 8 18 29 98.078
Support Satisfaction59 1 2 3 7 11 35 98.179
Support Improvement56 1 11 6 4 9 25 97.438
Company Loyalty59 2 2 2 3 3 9 38 97.989
Open Source Interest49 2 1 1 2 2 3 38 98.069

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS62 00.00%
Considering new Interface62 58.06%
System Installed on time?62 5995.16%
Average Collection size: 104566
TypeCount
Public42
Academic7
School3
Consortia0
Special2
Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0007
[2] 10,001-100,00034
[3] 100,001-250,0008
[4] 250,001-1,000,0005
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010
Product: Koha -- ByWater Solutions Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction37 1 2 12 8 14 97.868
ILS Functionality0 07.86
Print Functionality0 07.86
Electronic Functionality0 07.86
Company Satisfaction37 4 14 19 98.419
Support Satisfaction36 3 14 19 98.449
Support Improvement37 1 3 10 23 98.469
Company Loyalty37 2 6 29 98.739
Open Source Interest37 37 99.009

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS40 12.50%
Considering new Interface40 12.50%
System Installed on time?40 3690.00%
Average Collection size: 57706
TypeCount
Public26
Academic8
School1
Consortia0
Special1
Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0004
[2] 10,001-100,00028
[3] 100,001-250,0005
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010
Product: Koha -- ByWater Solutions Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction1 1 99.009
ILS Functionality0 09.00
Print Functionality0 09.00
Electronic Functionality0 09.00
Company Satisfaction1 1 99.009
Support Satisfaction1 1 99.009
Support Improvement1 1 99.009
Company Loyalty1 1 99.009
Open Source Interest1 1 99.009

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS1 00.00%
Considering new Interface1 00.00%
System Installed on time?1 1100.00%
Product: Koha -- ByWater Solutions Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction0 09.00
ILS Functionality0 09.00
Print Functionality0 09.00
Electronic Functionality0 09.00
Company Satisfaction0 09.00
Support Satisfaction0 09.00
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty0 09.00
Open Source Interest0 09.00

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS0 00.00%
Considering new Interface0 00.00%
System Installed on time?0 00.00%
Product: Koha -- ByWater Solutions Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction0 09.00
ILS Functionality0 09.00
Print Functionality0 09.00
Electronic Functionality0 09.00
Company Satisfaction0 09.00
Support Satisfaction0 09.00
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty0 09.00
Open Source Interest0 09.00

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS0 00.00%
Considering new Interface0 00.00%
System Installed on time?0 00.00%

Comments

We currently do use an open-sourse ILS, Koha, and have for a few years. (Type: Public)

System is brand new. Still getting the kinks out. (Type: Public)

The Authority control on Koha is improving over time, but there are notable features missing that slow the cataloging department way down. (Type: Academic)

Very pleased with Koha, especially public interface (Type: Academic)

We have had Koha for only 6 months. (Type: Public)

For digital collection, we get marc records from our vendors for digital content. These records include a link to the digital content from our opac. Bywater solutions has been a pleasure to work with. Their service levels are great- and their knowledge of their product is also top notch. (Type: Public)

Searching capability less satisfactory than traditional ILS. Searching by "title as phrase" or keyword often produces less than desirable results especially on the part of patrons who often don't understand how to search. Reports are also not as good as "canned" reports in traditional ILS. However, there are reports on the Koha wiki that can be adapted for use and ByWater has been great about helping construct individual reports as needed. Fact is, our limited staff does not have the ability/desire to learn SQL better. In summary, Koha is the extremely cost effective solution we needed and ByWater Solutions has been responsive to our needs. (Type: Public)

Circulation is now at 20,000 items (Type: Public)

Koha is not yet installed as our ILS. It is expected to be up by next summer. (Type: Academic)

OPAC functions are managed in the discovery interface--WCL. The ILS is for back office operations. (Type: Academic)

Bywater hosts and assists in support of our Koha installation which is part of a consortium of [...]. We couldn't have picked a better partner. (Type: Public)

We have had 2 Koha vendors (ByWater & PTFS). Both provided bad service and a product that was not fully functional for the needs of our library. (Type: Public)

With our previous proprietary ILS we were paying for the license to use the system; support and training requests were met with a bill; there was no option to customize the system or to participate in the development of new features that we considered important--only to purchase the next level package. With Koha we have an Open Source product that meets our needs; provides more up to date services to our users; is under constant development; and we are able to sponsor or to join forces with other Koha libraries to develop new features--all at lesser cost and with excellent support. (Type: Academic)

Overall we are happy with Koha ILS. Subject heading authority control is far from satisfactory. (Type: Academic)

Using an open source product now. (Type: Public)

Excellent ILS for our needs. Excellent customer support. (Type: Public)

ByWater Solutions is our Koha support vendor. (Type: Public)

We are currently using Koha so are using an open source ILS with ByWater Solutions as our service company. (Type: Public)

Where does this library direct most of its ILS support issues? Does not include an optional response for community support. (Type: Public)

The migration from Sirsi Dynix Horizon to Koha is still ongoing 6 months after work began. I think this was made unnecessarily difficult because of our agency's decision not to pay Sirsi Dynix for our data. This has caused ByWater to try to extract and map the data which takes a very long time. (Type: State)

By-Water Solutions is extremely responsive to needs of the end user. Their staff is helpful from the top on down. (Type: Academic)

For the most part, ByWater Solutions is great at responding right away to problems; I'd say 80 - 90% of the time, they respond to an issue within 24 hours of posting a ticket, even on the weekends. For the "easy" questions, they resolve them same business day as the posting of the ticket. (Type: Public)

We love working with open-source Koha because we can customize for Acquisition and Circulation Department needs. (Type: Public)

Sorry, but this question does not make sense to me: Would the library consider working with this company again if it were to migrate to a new ILS in the future? (Type: Public)

KOHA is very flexible, but you have to really know SQL, et al in order to use it well. ByWater expensive to host. No browse search. Don't find it as useful as some other system's I've used. Too busy and understaffed to learn programming and sql at this point in my life, although I would like to. (Type: Public)

Our library has almost no electronic resources and we have elected not to integrate them with our ILS due to consortial concerns, therefore the answer to the question "How effective is this product in managing your library's electronic resources?" should really be "Does not apply." (Type: Public)

ILS