Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Select another Product Report:

Statistical Report for Atriuum


2022 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction73 2 2 1 4 12 23 29 97.848
ILS Functionality73 2 1 4 4 12 17 33 97.828
Print Functionality72 2 4 2 10 23 31 97.798
Electronic Functionality71 5 2 1 3 4 6 7 10 11 22 96.447
Company Satisfaction72 2 1 2 2 5 10 20 30 97.638
Support Satisfaction71 1 1 2 3 3 14 9 38 97.809
Support Improvement0 00.00
Company Loyalty73 2 1 1 7 3 7 16 36 97.668
Open Source Interest70 20 4 7 6 6 10 8 1 4 3 03.343

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS76 67.89%
Considering new Interface76 00.00%
System Installed on time?76 00.00%

Average Collection size: 48082

TypeCount
Public69
Academic0
School1
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0009
[2] 10,001-100,00055
[3] 100,001-250,00010
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2021 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction88 1 11 15 24 37 97.978
ILS Functionality88 10 21 22 35 97.938
Print Functionality88 1 1 4 14 25 43 98.138
Electronic Functionality85 2 1 1 1 4 9 9 13 13 32 97.118
Company Satisfaction88 1 1 9 10 20 47 98.139
Support Satisfaction88 3 3 5 9 15 53 98.159
Support Improvement0 00.00
Company Loyalty88 2 1 8 13 17 47 98.089
Open Source Interest80 33 4 6 9 3 12 6 2 4 1 02.582

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS90 00.00%
Considering new Interface90 00.00%
System Installed on time?90 00.00%

Average Collection size: 43686

TypeCount
Public81
Academic0
School3
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0006
[2] 10,001-100,00073
[3] 100,001-250,00010
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2020 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction97 1 2 3 18 27 46 98.128
ILS Functionality95 2 1 9 14 27 42 97.978
Print Functionality94 1 4 7 14 26 42 97.988
Electronic Functionality89 7 1 10 8 20 15 28 96.897
Company Satisfaction96 1 3 3 10 22 57 98.289
Support Satisfaction97 1 4 2 8 16 66 98.389
Support Improvement0 00.00
Company Loyalty95 1 1 1 1 9 11 13 58 98.089
Open Source Interest85 26 3 5 8 8 10 12 3 4 3 03.543

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS97 88.25%
Considering new Interface97 00.00%
System Installed on time?97 00.00%

Average Collection size: 32151

TypeCount
Public83
Academic2
School4
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00015
[2] 10,001-100,00078
[3] 100,001-250,0003
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2019 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction78 1 1 3 4 10 25 34 97.948
ILS Functionality78 1 3 3 3 11 24 33 97.868
Print Functionality74 1 1 3 2 8 23 36 98.078
Electronic Functionality70 7 3 4 7 14 16 19 96.548
Company Satisfaction76 1 1 1 3 2 7 19 42 98.099
Support Satisfaction75 2 3 2 1 4 16 47 98.179
Support Improvement74 1 3 4 17 1 4 13 31 97.158
Company Loyalty76 2 1 4 2 5 8 8 46 97.799
Open Source Interest77 33 8 9 2 9 4 4 2 1 5 02.321

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS79 45.06%
Considering new Interface79 33.80%
System Installed on time?79 7696.20%

Average Collection size: 52122

TypeCount
Public66
Academic3
School4
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00012
[2] 10,001-100,00058
[3] 100,001-250,0007
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2018 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction101 1 2 5 7 12 28 46 97.908
ILS Functionality101 1 1 2 6 7 18 25 41 97.718
Print Functionality101 1 1 1 1 8 11 32 46 97.978
Electronic Functionality91 4 2 1 3 6 8 6 13 20 28 96.778
Company Satisfaction100 1 2 2 2 4 12 22 55 98.049
Support Satisfaction98 2 1 6 1 9 22 57 98.099
Support Improvement97 1 8 27 4 9 11 37 96.987
Company Loyalty99 2 1 4 1 3 3 3 13 17 52 97.609
Open Source Interest99 40 9 11 4 9 15 4 3 4 02.372

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS101 65.94%
Considering new Interface101 10.99%
System Installed on time?101 9897.03%

Average Collection size: 40719

TypeCount
Public86
Academic1
School6
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00013
[2] 10,001-100,00079
[3] 100,001-250,0007
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2017 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction115 2 2 2 2 4 11 40 52 97.978
ILS Functionality115 1 3 2 1 5 12 48 43 87.908
Print Functionality114 2 1 1 2 2 3 9 40 54 97.988
Electronic Functionality106 6 1 2 2 6 6 6 20 26 31 96.878
Company Satisfaction115 2 2 3 2 13 33 60 98.089
Support Satisfaction114 1 2 2 2 2 6 31 68 98.259
Support Improvement104 3 8 15 6 12 14 46 97.338
Company Loyalty112 6 1 2 4 1 14 25 59 97.739
Open Source Interest112 54 9 6 7 15 6 5 7 2 1 02.111

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS115 43.48%
Considering new Interface115 21.74%
System Installed on time?115 11297.39%

Average Collection size: 41608

TypeCount
Public95
Academic1
School11
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00015
[2] 10,001-100,00089
[3] 100,001-250,0006
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2016 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction101 2 3 2 3 16 32 43 97.918
ILS Functionality101 2 1 2 1 4 20 36 35 87.798
Print Functionality97 3 2 2 5 6 36 43 97.988
Electronic Functionality97 5 2 1 3 5 10 9 8 22 32 96.778
Company Satisfaction100 1 1 2 1 2 6 10 28 49 97.948
Support Satisfaction99 1 2 4 4 10 26 52 98.089
Support Improvement99 2 1 6 18 11 7 21 33 97.068
Company Loyalty98 1 1 1 1 1 6 5 9 22 51 97.849
Open Source Interest99 46 9 7 6 10 9 5 3 1 3 02.141

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS102 87.84%
Considering new Interface102 21.96%
System Installed on time?102 9593.14%

Average Collection size: 35661

TypeCount
Public89
Academic0
School7
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00013
[2] 10,001-100,00083
[3] 100,001-250,0004
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2015 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction133 1 2 1 4 2 9 22 39 53 97.748
ILS Functionality133 2 6 1 4 12 22 40 46 97.568
Print Functionality130 1 1 3 3 6 5 19 32 60 97.788
Electronic Functionality117 3 1 2 5 4 8 10 21 31 32 97.008
Company Satisfaction131 1 2 1 1 5 10 12 27 72 97.989
Support Satisfaction131 1 2 3 2 6 11 28 78 98.159
Support Improvement127 1 1 2 8 24 5 8 23 55 97.288
Company Loyalty130 5 3 2 2 3 5 8 13 28 61 97.408
Open Source Interest130 56 16 15 5 19 11 2 3 2 1 01.921

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS138 85.80%
Considering new Interface138 42.90%
System Installed on time?138 12792.03%

Average Collection size: 14631666

TypeCount
Public121
Academic0
School12
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00013
[2] 10,001-100,000116
[3] 100,001-250,0005
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0011



2014 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction218 1 1 5 9 39 64 99 98.068
ILS Functionality218 1 4 21 38 70 84 97.948
Print Functionality218 1 1 1 7 10 31 65 102 98.078
Electronic Functionality208 9 2 4 5 22 17 28 48 73 97.148
Company Satisfaction216 1 1 1 1 2 11 22 67 110 98.179
Support Satisfaction218 1 1 2 4 10 25 47 128 98.219
Support Improvement207 1 1 1 6 31 21 28 33 85 97.418
Company Loyalty213 4 1 2 1 4 10 17 18 41 115 97.829
Open Source Interest211 92 18 24 10 27 26 4 3 2 5 02.091

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS223 31.35%
Considering new Interface223 31.35%
System Installed on time?223 21495.96%

Average Collection size: 31803

TypeCount
Public185
Academic1
School35
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00038
[2] 10,001-100,000170
[3] 100,001-250,0003
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2013 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction221 1 1 1 1 1 5 10 31 66 104 98.048
ILS Functionality221 1 2 2 1 3 10 33 73 96 98.008
Print Functionality221 1 1 1 6 12 24 69 107 98.128
Electronic Functionality214 5 4 2 4 19 20 32 52 76 97.338
Company Satisfaction220 1 1 1 1 8 2 20 62 124 98.249
Support Satisfaction218 1 1 1 2 1 6 4 21 46 135 98.249
Support Improvement212 1 1 6 31 10 12 46 105 97.728
Company Loyalty217 3 1 3 9 12 17 45 127 98.089
Open Source Interest210 102 20 12 8 18 34 8 3 1 4 02.011

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS229 31.31%
Considering new Interface229 20.87%
System Installed on time?229 21393.01%

Average Collection size: 43562

TypeCount
Public174
Academic2
School53
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00030
[2] 10,001-100,000169
[3] 100,001-250,0004
[4] 250,001-1,000,0002
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2012 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction132 1 1 4 2 11 24 41 48 97.758
ILS Functionality132 1 1 3 7 11 20 56 33 87.588
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction132 1 1 3 11 13 47 56 98.008
Support Satisfaction133 1 3 1 3 9 12 31 73 98.069
Support Improvement129 1 1 4 28 10 9 24 52 97.328
Company Loyalty133 3 3 2 10 8 17 26 64 97.638
Open Source Interest131 50 14 15 10 8 14 8 5 3 4 02.442

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS136 53.68%
Considering new Interface136 10.74%
System Installed on time?136 13095.59%

Average Collection size: 38878

TypeCount
Public128
Academic1
School3
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,00010
[2] 10,001-100,000121
[3] 100,001-250,0004
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2011 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction32 1 3 1 8 8 11 97.638
ILS Functionality32 2 2 2 8 12 6 87.388
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction32 2 1 3 3 12 11 87.728
Support Satisfaction30 2 3 1 2 9 13 97.738
Support Improvement31 2 8 2 5 7 7 56.907
Company Loyalty31 1 5 2 5 8 10 97.428
Open Source Interest32 9 7 2 2 5 3 1 2 1 02.632

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS32 00.00%
Considering new Interface32 00.00%
System Installed on time?32 3093.75%

Average Collection size: 49962

TypeCount
Public28
Academic1
School1
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0002
[2] 10,001-100,00025
[3] 100,001-250,0005
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2010 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction23 1 1 1 2 5 9 4 87.098
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction23 1 1 1 5 8 7 87.438
Support Satisfaction23 1 1 1 4 7 9 97.618
Support Improvement21 1 8 1 1 5 5 56.577
Company Loyalty23 1 2 1 2 10 7 87.358
Open Source Interest22 10 4 4 1 2 1 01.681

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS24 14.17%
Considering new Interface24 00.00%
System Installed on time?24 2395.83%

Average Collection size: 26832

TypeCount
Public20
Academic1
School3
Consortia0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0002
[2] 10,001-100,00021
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0000
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0000
[6] over 10,000,0010



2009 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction55 1 1 3 4 13 14 19 97.538
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction55 1 2 1 3 2 9 16 21 97.568
Support Satisfaction55 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 18 22 97.568
Support Improvement53 1 1 1 1 14 3 7 13 12 56.747
Company Loyalty54 3 1 2 1 1 1 3 10 10 22 97.098
Open Source Interest53 15 7 4 5 3 10 2 2 2 3 03.043

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS56 610.71%
Considering new Interface56 23.57%
System Installed on time?56 4885.71%





2008 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction7 1 2 1 3 97.148
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction7 1 1 2 3 97.578
Support Satisfaction6 1 1 2 2 87.508
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty7 1 1 2 1 2 76.867
Open Source Interest6 3 2 1 12.172

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS7 114.29%
Considering new Interface7 00.00%
System Installed on time?7 571.43%





2007 Survey Results
Product: Atriuum Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction5 1 1 2 1 86.408
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction6 1 1 2 2 76.177
Support Satisfaction6 1 1 2 1 1 65.836
Support Improvement0 not applicable
Company Loyalty6 1 1 1 2 1 85.838
Open Source Interest6 2 3 1 11.501

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS6 00.00%
Considering new Interface6 00.00%
System Installed on time?6 116.67%




2022 : gen: 7.84 company 7.63 loyalty 7.66 support 7.80

2021 : gen: 7.97 company 8.13 loyalty 8.08 support 8.15

2020 : gen: 8.12 company 8.28 loyalty 8.08 support 8.38

2019 : gen: 7.94 company 8.09 loyalty 7.79 support 8.17

2018 : gen: 7.90 company 8.04 loyalty 7.60 support 8.09

2017 : gen: 7.97 company 8.08 loyalty 7.73 support 8.25

2016 : gen: 7.91 company 7.94 loyalty 7.84 support 8.08

2015 : gen: 7.74 company 7.98 loyalty 7.40 support 8.15

2014 : gen: 8.06 company 8.17 loyalty 7.82 support 8.21

2013 : gen: 8.04 company 8.24 loyalty 8.08 support 8.24

2012 : gen: 7.75 company 8.00 loyalty 7.63 support 8.06

2011 : gen: 7.63 company 7.72 loyalty 7.42 support 7.73

2010 : gen: 7.09 company 7.43 loyalty 7.35 support 7.61

2009 : gen: 7.53 company 7.56 loyalty 7.09 support 7.56

2008 : gen: 7.14 company 7.57 loyalty 6.86 support 7.50

2007 : gen: 6.40 company 6.17 loyalty 5.83 support 5.83

Comments

Our library is very pleased with BookSystems, don't want to change (Type: Public)

Good product with excellent tech support when you need it. Very happy with ATRIUUM. (Type: Public)

Don't know what open source is (Type: Public)

still needs fine tuning for tracking branch rotation of books overall very satisfied with service and impressed with the tech guys who walk us thru any issues. (Type: Public)

Cost is a consideration. School library budgets are shrinking. (Type: School)

We were considering Atriuum and Apollo-- we ended up going with Atriuum because cost for both systems was similar, and myself and my staff liked the layout of Atriuum better. I do think both are excellent systems. (Type: Public)

We are very satisfied with booksystems and plan to stay with them. (Type: Public)

Most of the problems we have had with the software has to do with issues with our network and security software than with the library software. The library software is hosted by the company and works fine on our home computer and mobile device, but tends to freeze on the school computers. (Type: School)

Atriuum's strength is in reports and material reclassification. We can easily come up a specific list of materials, allowing us to reclassify them in bulk without ever going to the shelves or racking our brains for titles. this saves us a great deal of time. Book Systems support is quick to address any issue that arises and is patient with user error. (Type: Public)

Our only real complaint with BookSystems is that they do not contact their patrons to alert us to upcoming upgrades. They also do not provide general help, providing clues to make sure we are using the fields correctly, etc. Their tech support is great--but sometimes problems occur that take them by surprise; e.g., a recent upgrade removed most of the thumbnails from our OPAC. They were surprised by the problem, and told us how to fix it after the fact. An alert in advance to make sure we were putting the correct ISBN or UPC code in the correct field would have saved us a LOT of time when we had to fix it. (Type: Public)

This company is great to listen to suggestions from librarians and to submit ideas as "enhancement requests". I recently had a problem on a Saturday and was pleased that someone answered the support phone! (Type: Public)

Excellent Service. (Type: Public)

We use Baker & Taylor for our e-book distribution, and so Atriuum can provide no assistance on our electronic services. Otherwise, we are satisfied with the service provided. (Type: Public)

Updates to the system are made at inopportune times. Changes would be better implemented over the weekend rather than during the workday. (Type: Public)

Only problem with Book Systems was the inventory capability. They are working on an upgrade. (Type: Academic)

This library does not own,or lease any electronic material (Type: Public)

We find building reports to be cumbersome. We are not using all the features because we don't have time to figure out how. (Type: Public)

I rarely have any trouble with Atriuum. Seldom call tech support. (Type: Public)

Very helpful and interested in making the experience better. (Type: Public)

As a public library we do not use most of the features in Atriuum that are intended for school libraries. It would be nice to be able to turn off all of these features, preferably with a single button. We spend a lot of time teaching workers what to ignore. (Type: Public)

I sometimes find they put out updates that haven't been fully BETA tested and have some kinks. They have been responsive to requests for new features although some small things like changing a tab name that might clarify things for patrons sometimes get ignored. Overall, they are much more responsive than our past vendors and we do feel the system has most things we need to run smoothly. (Type: Public)

I am very happy with Book Systems, I recommend them to anyone who ask. Their support and product is the best I have ever used. (Type: Public)

When I indicate not satisfying on the eBook question, that is because we just implemented eBooks through Overdrive in October and currently do not catalog those resources. And on the question of customer service, luckily, I do not have to contact Book Systems very often about issues. Whenever I do, they are always prompt and courteous. So that has not changed since we first implemented Atriuum. (Type: Public)

We are very happy with Atriuum; Destiny was not built with the librarians in mind and customer service was poor, while BookSystems is going overboard to help. Pricing is also something to consider (especially with more and more databases being necessary) and Follett seems to not care about smaller library budgets. We would love to find a good discovery interface that is reasonably priced and works with all our database and ebook vendors, but none exist! (Type: School)

Our collection number now reflects the ebooks that are available to patrons and that do show up in our catalog. (Type: Public)

Wish it was more for Public Libraries then School libraries. Reports are worded different. Not words that a public library would use. (Type: Public)

I am often frustrated with the wait time on customer service requests when it is a minor issue. On major issues - they're very good. On minor issues, it could be a few days and they haven't always answered or fixed my issues. (Type: Public)

There should be an option of "not applicable" for some of these questions (i.e. we don't have electronic resources to be managed, as of yet). I like most things about this system, which is very thorough. (Type: Public)

We recently upgraded from Concourse to Atriuum. The transfer went well and they provided a day long training program for all volunteers (Type: Church)

We just went live with Atrium by Book Systems in October 2014. To date, we are very satisfied with all aspects of the system. (Type: Public)

We don't know what an open source ILS is. We just became apart of the North Texas Independent Digital Consortium. (Type: Public)

Book System's Atriuum ILS is the absolute best system I have ever used. I have migrated three library systems to this product in the past eleven years. (Type: Public)

We are very satisfied with Atriuum and have no plans to change. (Type: Public)

We are a small library, so unfortunately we do not utilize all the features like we should. We are overall very satisfied with the product (Type: Public)

I really like this automation software. Here is the reasons I like this software; easy to use, so easy to use I have not had to ask for help, manages the library circulation , reports, and database proficiently. I love the reports that I can generate. I can link any letter or report with the student database. I love that it is web based. I can work at home it I need to. (Type: School)

Our regional director is the one that makes the changes in our system or the one who the changes must originate through (Type: Public)

ith my ILS system and its vendor. They have worked carefully with me to improve the system to meet my needs, and regularly communicate with me to learn how they can improve their product and their service. The staff at Book Systems are basically a part of my family. (Type: Public)

When searching for a title sometimes you have to be too exact with the title to get a result. Other times you enter a title and get pages and pages for a result and spend too much time searching. That is our only complaint at this time. (Type: Public)

There have been times when we have had trouble with the system. Times of slowness in going from page to page, finger scanner, sounds, and internet problems have occurred, some more than others. We usually can get this corrected with a phone call. But there re still times when the slowness of going from page to page causes a problem with checking out to our patrons. (Type: Public)

I Love the personal service provided my Book Systems. I am Totally Satisfied (Type: Public)

Atriuum automation system is the best to meet the requirements for reports, cataloging and fast reference. (Type: Public)

Our patrons love the easy-to-use OPAC and its good looks. Our circulation efficiency is at an all-time high; the same is true of our cataloging. We are a very small library with only one MLS librarian -- Atriuum by Book Systems gives us the robust tools to serve our patrons well. (Type: Public)

It is my understanding that a much updated and more useful version is available that would be even more effective and appreciated. It is free, we just need our technology coordinator to make the necessary changes. (Type: School)

I love Atriuum. It has been a blessing for Walters Public Library. If there is a problem of ANY KIND, I call and it gets solved within 3-4 hours, if they are very busy. (Type: Public)

We upgraded to Atriuum at the end of last year and I love it. It functions well and our students are enjoying the OPAC and using the Atriuum app on their devices. (Type: School)

In the last year we've added more ebooks and downloadable audiobooks and recently Freegal. (Type: Public)

We have had success with ATRIUUM. (Type: School)

Book Systems has been very responsive to any problems that we have encountered. We do not have our electronic resources integrated yet, but would like to have this done. (Type: Public)

The Book Systems staff is always responsive to our requests. They are a small operation with very personal service at a cost small, rural libraries can afford. (Type: Public)

my booksystems atriuum product is serving us well and they are improving the product all the time. We are very satisfied. (Type: School)

[...] (Type: School)

Book Systems is a great ILS vendor for small libraries. They are continuously improving the product. They actually listen to their customers. Their prices are excellent. (Type: Public)

ILS