Statistical Report for Koha -- Interleaf Technology
| 1 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2024 |
| 4 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2023 |
| 5 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2022 |
| 1 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2021 |
| 2020 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Interleaf Technology |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 9 |
1 | | | | | 1 | | | 7 | | 8 | 6.78 | 8 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 9 |
1 | | | | | | 1 | 1 | 6 | | 8 | 6.78 | 8 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 9 |
| | | | | 1 | | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 7.67 | 8 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 9 |
1 | | | | | | | 3 | 5 | | 8 | 6.78 | 8 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 4 |
| | | 1 | | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6.75 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 9 |
| | | | 1 | | | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 7.67 | 8 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 9 |
1 | | | | | | | | 6 | 2 | 8 | 7.33 | 8 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 8 |
2 | | | 5 | | | | | | 1 | 3 | 3.00 | 3 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 9 |
1 | 11.11% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 9 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 9 |
0 | 0.00% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 33376667 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 0 |
|---|
| Academic | 3 |
|---|
| School | 0 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 5 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 1 |
|---|
| 2019 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Interleaf Technology |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 8 |
1 | 1 | 3 | | 2 | | | | 1 | | 2 | 2.88 | 2 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 8 |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | | 2 | | | 2 | 3.63 | 3 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 8 |
| | 1 | | 3 | 2 | | 1 | | 1 | 4 | 5.00 | 5 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 8 |
1 | | 2 | 1 | 3 | | | 1 | | | 4 | 3.25 | 4 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 8 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | 2 | | 8 | 4.25 | 5 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 8 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 | 2 | | 1 | 4.25 | 4 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 7 |
1 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 0 | 3.71 | 4 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 8 |
3 | | 1 | | 1 | | | 1 | 2 | | 0 | 3.63 | 4 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 8 |
2 | 1 | 1 | | 3 | | | | | 1 | 4 | 3.00 | 4 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 8 |
3 | 37.50% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 8 |
1 | 12.50% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 8 |
3 | 37.50% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 99000 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 0 |
|---|
| Academic | 8 |
|---|
| School | 0 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 0 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 5 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 2 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 2018 Survey Results |
| Product: Koha -- Interleaf Technology |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
|---|
| Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
|---|
| ILS Satisfaction | 11 |
1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | | | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4.73 | 6 |
|---|
| ILS Functionality | 11 |
1 | | 2 | 2 | 1 | | 1 | 3 | | 1 | 7 | 4.55 | 4 |
|---|
| Print Functionality | 11 |
| | 1 | | 2 | 2 | | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5.91 | 7 |
|---|
| Electronic Functionality | 10 |
1 | 1 | 3 | | 1 | 1 | | 3 | | | 2 | 3.70 | 4 |
|---|
| Company Satisfaction | 11 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5.09 | 6 |
|---|
| Support Satisfaction | 11 |
| 1 | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | | 1 | 3 | 5.00 | 5 |
|---|
| Support Improvement | 11 |
1 | | | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 4 | 4.55 | 4 |
|---|
| Company Loyalty | 11 |
4 | | | 1 | | | 3 | | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.18 | 6 |
|---|
| Open Source Interest | 10 |
4 | | | | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4.50 | 6 |
|---|
| Category | Total | Yes | percent |
|---|
| Considering new ILS | 11 |
3 | 27.27% |
|---|
| Considering new Interface | 11 |
2 | 18.18% |
|---|
| System Installed on time? | 11 |
10 | 90.91% |
|---|
| Average Collection size: |
| 67849 |
|---|
| Type | Count |
|---|
| Public | 0 |
|---|
| Academic | 8 |
|---|
| School | 0 |
|---|
| Consortium | 0 |
|---|
| Special | 1 |
|---|
| Size Category | Count |
|---|
| [1] Under 10,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [2] 10,001-100,000 | 7 |
|---|
| [3] 100,001-250,000 | 1 |
|---|
| [4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
|---|
| [6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
|---|
| 5 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2017 |
| 3 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2016 |
Statistics according to type and size categories
The following table presents the 2015 results according to the type and size of the library.
| Koha -- Interleaf Technology | all | Academic | Public | School | Consortium |
|---|
| | small | medium | large | small | medium | large | | |
|---|
| n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg |
|---|
| SatisfactionLevelILS | 4 | |
3 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| ILSFunctionality | 4 | |
3 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| PrintFunctionality | 4 | |
3 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| ElectronicFunctionality | 4 | |
3 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| SatisfactionCustomerSupport | 4 | |
3 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| CompanyLoyalty | 3 | |
2 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|---|
| 4 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2015 |
| 4 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2014 |
| 2 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2013 |
| 0 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2012 |
| 0 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2011 |
| 0 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2010 |
| 0 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2009 |
| 0 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2008 |
| 0 Responses for Koha -- Interleaf Technology in 2007 |
2020 : gen: 6.78 company 6.75 loyalty 7.33 support 7.67
2019 : gen: 2.88 company 4.25 loyalty 3.63 support 4.25
2018 : gen: 4.73 company 5.09 loyalty 4.18 support 5.00
Comments
Koha is generally an excellent library system and meets our needs. Because it is open source we have been able to extract data into QIk View data management system, thus overcoming one its weaknesses - reporting. We were also able to set up EDI purchasing to meet our specific requirements. We had some problems with automating data import and configuration between our systems and suppliers - now resolved but we have spent approx. £3000 post installation on development costs. We would have liked e-resource management but systems with this function were prohibitively expensive.
(Type: Academic)