Statistical Report for Koha -- LibLime
0 Responses for Koha -- LibLime in 2024 |
0 Responses for Koha -- LibLime in 2023 |
0 Responses for Koha -- LibLime in 2022 |
3 Responses for Koha -- LibLime in 2021 |
2020 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 6 |
| | 1 | | | 1 | | 3 | 1 | | 7 | 6.00 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 6 |
| | | 1 | | 2 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6.00 | 6 |
Print Functionality | 6 |
| | | | 1 | | | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7.33 | 8 |
Electronic Functionality | 6 |
1 | | 1 | 1 | | 2 | | 1 | | | 5 | 3.67 | 5 |
Company Satisfaction | 6 |
| | 1 | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | | 8 | 6.00 | 7 |
Support Satisfaction | 6 |
| | 1 | | | | 2 | 1 | | 2 | 6 | 6.50 | 7 |
Support Improvement | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Company Loyalty | 6 |
| | 1 | | | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 9 | 6.33 | 7 |
Open Source Interest | 4 |
1 | | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | 0 | 6.00 | 5 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 7 |
2 | 28.57% |
Considering new Interface | 7 |
0 | 0.00% |
System Installed on time? | 7 |
0 | 0.00% |
Average Collection size: |
| 23036 |
Type | Count |
Public | 2 |
Academic | 1 |
School | 2 |
Consortium | 0 |
Special | 0 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 1 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 6 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 0 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 0 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2019 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 11 |
| | 1 | | | | 1 | 6 | 3 | | 7 | 6.73 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 11 |
| | | | | | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 7.09 | 7 |
Print Functionality | 11 |
| | | | | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | | 8 | 6.91 | 7 |
Electronic Functionality | 10 |
1 | | 1 | | 3 | | 2 | 1 | 2 | | 4 | 4.90 | 6 |
Company Satisfaction | 11 |
| | 1 | | | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6.36 | 7 |
Support Satisfaction | 10 |
| | | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | | 7 | 5.90 | 7 |
Support Improvement | 10 |
| | | | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | 4 | 5.50 | 6 |
Company Loyalty | 11 |
1 | | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 5.91 | 7 |
Open Source Interest | 11 |
1 | | | 1 | | 3 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6.09 | 6 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 11 |
1 | 9.09% |
Considering new Interface | 11 |
1 | 9.09% |
System Installed on time? | 11 |
10 | 90.91% |
Average Collection size: |
| 30530 |
Type | Count |
Public | 4 |
Academic | 3 |
School | 1 |
Consortium | 0 |
Special | 1 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 3 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 7 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 1 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 0 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2018 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 6 |
| | | | | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7.17 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 6 |
| | | | | | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7.00 | 7 |
Print Functionality | 5 |
| | | | | | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7.80 | 8 |
Electronic Functionality | 6 |
| | | 1 | 1 | 2 | | 1 | | 1 | 5 | 5.50 | 5 |
Company Satisfaction | 5 |
| | | | 1 | | 3 | 1 | | | 6 | 5.80 | 6 |
Support Satisfaction | 6 |
| | | | 1 | | 2 | 2 | | 1 | 6 | 6.50 | 7 |
Support Improvement | 6 |
| | | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 5 | 5.83 | 6 |
Company Loyalty | 6 |
| 1 | | | | 3 | | 1 | | 1 | 5 | 5.33 | 5 |
Open Source Interest | 6 |
| | | | 1 | | | | 1 | 4 | 9 | 8.00 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 6 |
2 | 33.33% |
Considering new Interface | 6 |
0 | 0.00% |
System Installed on time? | 6 |
5 | 83.33% |
Average Collection size: |
| 18300 |
Type | Count |
Public | 0 |
Academic | 1 |
School | 1 |
Consortium | 0 |
Special | 1 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 2 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 4 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 0 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 0 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2017 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 35 |
| | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 6.31 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 35 |
| | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 6.26 | 6 |
Print Functionality | 34 |
| | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 15 | 4 | 8 | 7.15 | 8 |
Electronic Functionality | 32 |
| 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | | 9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5.97 | 6 |
Company Satisfaction | 35 |
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6.03 | 7 |
Support Satisfaction | 34 |
| 1 | | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6.26 | 7 |
Support Improvement | 33 |
| | | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5.64 | 5 |
Company Loyalty | 34 |
4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5.53 | 7 |
Open Source Interest | 33 |
2 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 6.64 | 8 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 35 |
10 | 28.57% |
Considering new Interface | 35 |
4 | 11.43% |
System Installed on time? | 35 |
32 | 91.43% |
Average Collection size: |
| 124191 |
Type | Count |
Public | 18 |
Academic | 5 |
School | 0 |
Consortium | 1 |
Special | 3 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 5 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 20 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 4 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 2 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 1 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2016 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 30 |
| 1 | | | 1 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 6.67 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 30 |
| 1 | | 1 | | 6 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 6.53 | 7 |
Print Functionality | 29 |
| | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 3 | 8 | 7.03 | 8 |
Electronic Functionality | 28 |
1 | | | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 4 | | 7 | 5.79 | 6 |
Company Satisfaction | 30 |
1 | | | 1 | | 6 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 6.53 | 7 |
Support Satisfaction | 29 |
1 | | | | 3 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 6.48 | 7 |
Support Improvement | 28 |
1 | | | 1 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 5.64 | 6 |
Company Loyalty | 27 |
3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 5.89 | 7 |
Open Source Interest | 28 |
2 | | 1 | | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 6.96 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 31 |
7 | 22.58% |
Considering new Interface | 31 |
7 | 22.58% |
System Installed on time? | 31 |
27 | 87.10% |
Average Collection size: |
| 93177 |
Type | Count |
Public | 12 |
Academic | 6 |
School | 2 |
Consortium | 1 |
Special | 3 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 6 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 17 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 3 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 1 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 1 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
Statistics according to type and size categories
The following table presents the 2015 results according to the type and size of the library.
Koha -- LibLime | all | Academic | Public | School | Consortium |
| | small | medium | large | small | medium | large | | |
| n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg | n | avg |
SatisfactionLevelILS | 32 | 6.41 |
5 | | 1 | | 0 | | 13 | 6.46 | 2 | | 0 | | 1 | | 2 | |
ILSFunctionality | 32 | 6.56 |
5 | | 1 | | 0 | | 13 | 6.38 | 2 | | 0 | | 1 | | 2 | |
PrintFunctionality | 32 | 6.91 |
5 | | 1 | | 0 | | 13 | 6.77 | 2 | | 0 | | 1 | | 2 | |
ElectronicFunctionality | 31 | 4.55 |
5 | | 1 | | 0 | | 13 | 5.69 | 2 | | 0 | | 1 | | 2 | |
SatisfactionCustomerSupport | 32 | 5.94 |
5 | | 1 | | 0 | | 13 | 6.23 | 2 | | 0 | | 1 | | 2 | |
CompanyLoyalty | 32 | 5.53 |
5 | | 1 | | 0 | | 13 | 6.15 | 2 | | 0 | | 1 | | 2 | |
2015 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 32 |
1 | | 1 | | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6.41 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 32 |
1 | | | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 6.56 | 7 |
Print Functionality | 32 |
1 | | 2 | | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 8 | 6.91 | 8 |
Electronic Functionality | 31 |
6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4.55 | 5 |
Company Satisfaction | 32 |
2 | | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 6.09 | 7 |
Support Satisfaction | 32 |
2 | | 3 | 5 | | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 5.94 | 7 |
Support Improvement | 30 |
3 | 1 | | 2 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.53 | 6 |
Company Loyalty | 32 |
4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 5.53 | 6 |
Open Source Interest | 28 |
3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 6.43 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 34 |
3 | 8.82% |
Considering new Interface | 34 |
5 | 14.71% |
System Installed on time? | 34 |
28 | 82.35% |
Average Collection size: |
| 246303 |
Type | Count |
Public | 15 |
Academic | 6 |
School | 1 |
Consortium | 2 |
Special | 3 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 3 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 18 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 7 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 2 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 2 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2014 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 25 |
| | 1 | 1 | | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 6.52 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 25 |
| | 1 | 1 | | 3 | 8 | 10 | 2 | | 7 | 6.16 | 6 |
Print Functionality | 24 |
| | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7.13 | 7 |
Electronic Functionality | 25 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 4 | | 4 | 5.08 | 5 |
Company Satisfaction | 25 |
| | 3 | 2 | | 3 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 6.36 | 7 |
Support Satisfaction | 25 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6.28 | 7 |
Support Improvement | 25 |
1 | 1 | | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 5.96 | 7 |
Company Loyalty | 25 |
4 | | | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5.84 | 7 |
Open Source Interest | 22 |
1 | 1 | | 2 | | 1 | | | 4 | 13 | 9 | 7.32 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 26 |
6 | 23.08% |
Considering new Interface | 26 |
8 | 30.77% |
System Installed on time? | 26 |
24 | 92.31% |
Average Collection size: |
| 284374 |
Type | Count |
Public | 13 |
Academic | 4 |
School | 2 |
Consortium | 2 |
Special | 2 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 3 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 16 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 1 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 3 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 1 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2013 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 17 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 5.65 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 17 |
1 | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 5.65 | 7 |
Print Functionality | 17 |
1 | | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 6.35 | 7 |
Electronic Functionality | 16 |
3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4.56 | 5 |
Company Satisfaction | 17 |
2 | 2 | 2 | | | 2 | 1 | 3 | | 5 | 9 | 5.18 | 6 |
Support Satisfaction | 17 |
1 | 3 | 3 | | | 2 | | 3 | | 5 | 9 | 5.00 | 5 |
Support Improvement | 17 |
2 | 3 | | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | 1 | 4 | 9 | 4.82 | 5 |
Company Loyalty | 17 |
6 | | | 1 | 2 | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4.53 | 4 |
Open Source Interest | 15 |
1 | 2 | | | | | 1 | 1 | | 10 | 9 | 7.00 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 17 |
5 | 29.41% |
Considering new Interface | 17 |
5 | 29.41% |
System Installed on time? | 17 |
14 | 82.35% |
Average Collection size: |
| 414741 |
Type | Count |
Public | 6 |
Academic | 3 |
School | 2 |
Consortium | 2 |
Special | 2 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 1 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 8 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 1 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 4 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 1 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2012 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 32 |
3 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5.84 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 32 |
| 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5.69 | 7 |
Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Company Satisfaction | 32 |
2 | | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5.53 | 6 |
Support Satisfaction | 32 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5.56 | 7 |
Support Improvement | 30 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5.27 | 5 |
Company Loyalty | 32 |
8 | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4.78 | 6 |
Open Source Interest | 30 |
3 | 1 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 16 | 9 | 6.73 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 34 |
5 | 14.71% |
Considering new Interface | 34 |
2 | 5.88% |
System Installed on time? | 34 |
27 | 79.41% |
Average Collection size: |
| 131383 |
Type | Count |
Public | 14 |
Academic | 12 |
School | 1 |
Consortium | 1 |
Special | 2 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 5 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 18 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 3 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 6 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 0 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2011 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 47 |
5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 5.47 | 6 |
ILS Functionality | 45 |
2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5.64 | 7 |
Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Company Satisfaction | 46 |
6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 4.63 | 5 |
Support Satisfaction | 47 |
3 | 6 | 7 | 4 | | 4 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 4.66 | 5 |
Support Improvement | 46 |
2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5.11 | 5 |
Company Loyalty | 47 |
11 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 4.32 | 5 |
Open Source Interest | 41 |
7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | 4 | 2 | 22 | 9 | 6.34 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 48 |
12 | 25.00% |
Considering new Interface | 48 |
9 | 18.75% |
System Installed on time? | 48 |
35 | 72.92% |
Average Collection size: |
| 156716 |
Type | Count |
Public | 21 |
Academic | 13 |
School | 5 |
Consortium | 1 |
Special | 3 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 5 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 27 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 3 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 6 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 1 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2010 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 31 |
| | | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 6.90 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Company Satisfaction | 30 |
| | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5.90 | 6 |
Support Satisfaction | 31 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 5.65 | 6 |
Support Improvement | 31 |
2 | 1 | | 1 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5.55 | 5 |
Company Loyalty | 31 |
6 | | 1 | | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 5.23 | 6 |
Open Source Interest | 28 |
1 | | | | | | 1 | | 2 | 24 | 9 | 8.50 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 31 |
4 | 12.90% |
Considering new Interface | 31 |
7 | 22.58% |
System Installed on time? | 31 |
27 | 87.10% |
Average Collection size: |
| 176160 |
Type | Count |
Public | 11 |
Academic | 5 |
School | 3 |
Consortium | 2 |
Special | 3 |
Size Category | Count |
[1] Under 10,000 | 4 |
[2] 10,001-100,000 | 15 |
[3] 100,001-250,000 | 2 |
[4] 250,001-1,000,000 | 5 |
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,000 | 1 |
[6] over 10,000,001 | 0 |
2009 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 49 |
| | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 14 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 6.12 | 7 |
ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Company Satisfaction | 49 |
2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 5.47 | 6 |
Support Satisfaction | 49 |
4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 5.35 | 6 |
Support Improvement | 45 |
6 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4.62 | 5 |
Company Loyalty | 48 |
12 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 4.90 | 6 |
Open Source Interest | 46 |
2 | | | | 1 | 3 | | 1 | | 39 | 9 | 8.20 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 49 |
5 | 10.20% |
Considering new Interface | 49 |
3 | 6.12% |
System Installed on time? | 49 |
39 | 79.59% |
2008 Survey Results |
Product: Koha -- LibLime |
Response Distribution |
Statistics |
Category | Responses |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Mode | Mean | Median |
ILS Satisfaction | 25 |
3 | | | 2 | | 2 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5.92 | 6 |
ILS Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Print Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Electronic Functionality | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | |
Company Satisfaction | 25 |
2 | | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5.84 | 7 |
Support Satisfaction | 25 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5.52 | 6 |
Support Improvement | 0 |
not applicable |
Company Loyalty | 25 |
4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 5.24 | 6 |
Open Source Interest | 20 |
1 | | | | | 2 | | 1 | | 16 | 9 | 8.05 | 9 |
Category | Total | Yes | percent |
Considering new ILS | 25 |
5 | 20.00% |
Considering new Interface | 25 |
0 | 0.00% |
System Installed on time? | 25 |
20 | 80.00% |
2 Responses for Koha -- LibLime in 2007 |
2020 : gen: 6.00 company 6.00 loyalty 6.33 support 6.50
2019 : gen: 6.73 company 6.36 loyalty 5.91 support 5.90
2018 : gen: 7.17 company 5.80 loyalty 5.33 support 6.50
2017 : gen: 6.31 company 6.03 loyalty 5.53 support 6.26
2016 : gen: 6.67 company 6.53 loyalty 5.89 support 6.48
2015 : gen: 6.41 company 6.09 loyalty 5.53 support 5.94
2014 : gen: 6.52 company 6.36 loyalty 5.84 support 6.28
2013 : gen: 5.65 company 5.18 loyalty 4.53 support 5.00
2012 : gen: 5.84 company 5.53 loyalty 4.78 support 5.56
2011 : gen: 5.47 company 4.63 loyalty 4.32 support 4.66
2010 : gen: 6.90 company 5.90 loyalty 5.23 support 5.65
2009 : gen: 6.12 company 5.47 loyalty 4.90 support 5.35
2008 : gen: 5.92 company 5.84 loyalty 5.24 support 5.52
Comments
[...]
(Type: Public)
- We haven't explored the entire functionality of the system like using it to manage e-resources, we do not receive support from any company, we rely on colleagues who have the same
(Type: Academic)
Just have the nagging feeling that current vendor is losing interest in the ILS. Their documentation is pretty opaque. Asking for some usually elicits the response that we should 'check the release notes' ... but if the "feature" we are asking about came about in some earlier software release, there's no real way to know just where to look for help and explanations. As a result, we do a lot of blind flipping of switches to see what happens if we do this, or that, or these other two things in various combinations. At least that's how it seems.
(Type: Museum)
After almost 5 years, we still do not have the functionality we were told we would have on go live date. Basic searching is still not available. Sub titles do not show on pick lists, Check boxes only work page by page, not by search results.....
(Type: Public)
We are on 'LibLime Academic Koha' [LAK] They are planning to merge the LAK and Liblime Koha (public library version) next year - hopefully that won't be like a migration.
(Type: Academic)
[...] is a member of the [...] . ILS support and development, and contact directly with PTFS LibLime, is handled by System staff.
(Type: Public)
Currently using an open source ILS depending upon the definition of that - LibLime Koha. It might more accurately be termed Open Development.
(Type: Public)
We switched because our former representative was unavailable for questions and explanations more often than available. The former system would have been fine had there been better communication with our representative.
(Type: Public)
Things were much better before the last major upgrade. Now, the default seems to fall to whatever mode we do not want ...
(Type: Academic)
[...] anticipates moving to the LibLime academic codebase in 2016 which should improve the access to electronic resources and which will provide us with a discovery layer. We do an annual survey of our libraries regarding Koha and 75% are satisfied with the system, hence the 7 rating for the first two questions.
(Type: Consortium)
Would love to an ILL module, and more training on the technology options available in Koha.
(Type: Academic)
While my organization is satisfied overall with our open-source ILS, the vendor we have selected for hosting and support has not provided the level of customer service we would like to receive. Therefore, we are looking at keeping our existing ILS but soliciting a new host and support vendor in 2016.
(Type: Special)
While we'd love to implement an open source ILS, our parent company manages server space and working with IT can be difficult and require getting into a project queue. For that reason, we seek out SAAS solutions that are hosted by a third-party who provide support. It reduces the resources we need within the Library to manage these systems.
(Type: Academic)
The vendors for Aspen Cat are terrific and I have never experienced such timely availability. Someone is always available and ready to help with any problem.
(Type: Public)