Library Technology Guides

Documents, Databases, News, and Commentary

Select another Product Report:

Statistical Report for Locally developed

0 Responses for Locally developed in 2023

0 Responses for Locally developed in 2022

0 Responses for Locally developed in 2021

1 Responses for Locally developed in 2020

3 Responses for Locally developed in 2019

1 Responses for Locally developed in 2018

4 Responses for Locally developed in 2017


2016 Survey Results
Product: Locally developed Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction6 1 3 2 77.177
ILS Functionality6 2 1 3 87.178
Print Functionality6 1 2 3 86.838
Electronic Functionality6 1 2 1 2 66.677
Company Satisfaction6 1 1 3 1 86.838
Support Satisfaction6 1 1 3 1 86.508
Support Improvement6 1 1 1 3 86.178
Company Loyalty5 1 1 1 2 95.205
Open Source Interest6 1 4 1 54.505

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS7 228.57%
Considering new Interface7 00.00%
System Installed on time?7 571.43%

Average Collection size: 380241

TypeCount
Public1
Academic3
School0
Consortium0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,0003
[3] 100,001-250,0001
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010


Statistics according to type and size categories

The following table presents the 2015 results according to the type and size of the library.

Locally developedallAcademicPublicSchoolConsortium
smallmediumlargesmallmediumlarge
navgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavgnavg
SatisfactionLevelILS2 00000000
ILSFunctionality2 00000000
PrintFunctionality2 00000000
ElectronicFunctionality1 00000000
SatisfactionCustomerSupport1 00000000
CompanyLoyalty1 00000000


2 Responses for Locally developed in 2015

3 Responses for Locally developed in 2014

5 Responses for Locally developed in 2013

5 Responses for Locally developed in 2012

5 Responses for Locally developed in 2011


2010 Survey Results
Product: Locally developed Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction6 3 1 1 1 67.007
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction2 1 1 77.508
Support Satisfaction2 1 1 77.508
Support Improvement2 1 1 78.009
Company Loyalty2 1 1 13.005
Open Source Interest6 1 1 1 3 97.179

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS7 228.57%
Considering new Interface7 114.29%
System Installed on time?7 228.57%

Average Collection size: 292952

TypeCount
Public2
Academic2
School0
Consortium0
Special0

Size CategoryCount
[1] Under 10,0001
[2] 10,001-100,0004
[3] 100,001-250,0000
[4] 250,001-1,000,0001
[5] 1,000,001-10,000,0001
[6] over 10,000,0010



2009 Survey Results
Product: Locally developed Response Distribution Statistics
CategoryResponses 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ModeMeanMedian
ILS Satisfaction6 1 1 2 1 1 76.007
ILS Functionality0 00.00
Print Functionality0 00.00
Electronic Functionality0 00.00
Company Satisfaction5 1 1 2 1 86.008
Support Satisfaction5 1 1 1 1 1 25.807
Support Improvement5 1 2 1 1 55.005
Company Loyalty5 2 1 1 1 25.607
Open Source Interest6 1 2 1 1 1 13.836

CategoryTotalYespercent
Considering new ILS6 233.33%
Considering new Interface6 116.67%
System Installed on time?6 466.67%




3 Responses for Locally developed in 2008

3 Responses for Locally developed in 2007

2016 : gen: 7.17 company 6.83 loyalty 5.20 support 6.50

2010 : gen: 7.00 company 7.50 loyalty 3.00 support 7.50

2009 : gen: 6.00 company 6.00 loyalty 5.60 support 5.80

Comments

Current locally developed system uses MS Access. It is limited by the native constrains of Access, and is dependent on one person for maintenance. To date we have not identified a non-cloud-based commercial or open-source solution that fits our needs and budget. (Type: Museum)

ILS